U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Ojo v. INS

Ojo v. INS
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 8, 2000

Ojo v. INS

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1455

OLAKUNLE A. OJO, Petitioner, versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Ap- peals. (A72-416-950)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: February 8, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua A. Moses, JOSHUA MOSES & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Mary- land, for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Joseph F. Ciolino, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Olakunle Ajibola Ojo, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Ojo’s claims for suspension of deportation and voluntary departure and ordering him deported. We find that substantial evi- dence supports the Board’s decision that Ojo is statutorily pre- cluded from demonstrating the good moral character necessary to sustain applications for suspension of deportation or voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(f) (West 1999). Therefore, we deny Ojo’s petition for review.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.