Fozard v. Publishers Clearing
Fozard v. Publishers Clearing
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1740
NORA L. FOZARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-149-1)
Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: February 8, 2000
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles R. Holton, Natalie J. McKinney, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, P.L.L.C., Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert W. Spearman, R. Bruce Thompson, II, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina; James W. Harbison, Jr., MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, L.L.P., New York, New York, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Nora Fozard appeals the district court’s order granting Appel-
lee’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fozard v.
Publishers Clearing House, Inc., No. CA-98-149-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 29,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished