U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Fozard v. Publishers Clearing

Fozard v. Publishers Clearing
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 8, 2000

Fozard v. Publishers Clearing

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1740

NORA L. FOZARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-149-1)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: February 8, 2000

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. Holton, Natalie J. McKinney, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, P.L.L.C., Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert W.

Spearman, R. Bruce Thompson, II, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina; James W. Harbison, Jr., MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, L.L.P., New York, New York, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Nora Fozard appeals the district court’s order granting Appel- lee’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fozard v. Publishers Clearing House, Inc., No. CA-98-149-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.