Alexander v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 8, 2000

Opinion

No. 99-7127

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 99-7540

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 99-298-PJM)

Submitted: January 11, 2000 Decided: February 8, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendell C. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

In these consolidated appeals, Appellant Kendell C. Alexander

appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition and reconsideration of that order. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on

the reasoning of the district court. See Alexander v. United

States, No. CA-99-298-PJM (D. Md. July 27 & Sept. 30, 1999). We

deny Alexander’s motion to remand filed in No. 99-7127.

Furthermore, we deny Alexander’s motions captioned “Motion of

Expedite of Appeals” and “Motion to Strike Appellee’s Response to

Appellant’s Pro Se Informal Brief.” We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.