Furlough v. Garraghty
Furlough v. Garraghty
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6562
JAMIE RAY FURLOUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. A. GARRAGHTY, Warden; RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Director; G. P. WILLIAMS, Associate Warden; MS. MILLARD, Associate Warden; P. A. EDGE, Warden’s Designee; D. TRENT, Lieutenant, Housing Unit Manager; MS. BIGGS; M. MCKRINS- TRY, Law Library Supervisor; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
L. ADAMS, Law Library Official; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-98-322)
Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: February 7, 2000
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamie Ray Furlough, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jamie Ray Furlough appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Furlough v. Garraghty, No. CA-98-322 (E.D. Va.
Mar. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished