United States v. Gainey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gainey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7603

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ONTARIO LAMAR GAINEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-68, CA-99-89-4-H)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ontario Lamar Gainey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ontario Lamar Gainey seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying as untimely his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. The basis for the

claim Gainey seeks to raise was known to him at the time of sen-

tencing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal because the § 2255 motion was not timely filed.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished