Dixon v. Angelone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dixon v. Angelone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6811

DOUGLAS DIXON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-378-AM)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: February 17, 2000

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Douglas Dixon seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See Dixon v. Angelone, No. CA-99-

378-AM (E.D. Va. May 24, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on May 20, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 24, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished