U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Earl McCrae Scales

United States v. Earl McCrae Scales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 15, 2000

United States v. Earl McCrae Scales

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7485

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

EARL MCCRAE SCALES, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-97-243-1)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl McCrae Scales, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Earl McCrae Scales appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to enjoin the Bureau of Prisons from debiting his trust account to satisfy a restitution order. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Scales, No. CR-97-243-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.