United States v. Carr

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 14, 2000

Opinion

No. 99-7054

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-66-N)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

James E. Carr seeks to appeal the district court’s orders de-

nying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. Carr, No. CR-93-66-N (E.D. Va.

Sept. 24, July 10, 1998 and July 15, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. We also deny Carr’s motions to appoint

counsel, to authorize preparation of a transcript at government

expense, and to amend his informal brief.