U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Robinson v. Brightharp

Robinson v. Brightharp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 2000

Robinson v. Brightharp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7491

HERBERT ALONZO ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP, Captain at Lieber Correc- tional Institution; MICHAEL SHEEDY, Associate Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution; THIERRY D. NETTLES, Captain; MAE BROWN, of the Institutional Classification Committee, all in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-2539-2-17AJ)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Alonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Herbert Alonzo Robinson appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Robinson v. Brightharp, No. CA-99-2539-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.