UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7634

WILLIAM RAY JOHNSON,

Plaintiff- Appellant,

versus

G. K. HEGE, Sheriff; F. MEDLIN, Detective; SERGEANT WESTMORELAND, Detective; B. RAMKIN, Detective; T. KATES, Detective; K. BLACK, Detective; D. OWENS, Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-99-950-1)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William Ray Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Johnson v. Hege, No. CA-99-950-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 1999).* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 19, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 22, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

(4th Cir. 1986).

2