UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2623

STUART HILL; VICKI HILL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

STEVEN DUNN, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99- 89-AMD)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stuart Hill, Vicki Hill, Appellant Pro Se. William Davidson Evans, Jr., Senior Assistant County Attorney, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Stuart and Vicki Hill appeal the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the appellee on their 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint alleging malicious prosecution and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hill v. Dunn, No. CA-99-89-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 8 & 22, 1999). We deny Dunn’s motion to strike the appellants’ informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED