Glover v. Prime Care Medical

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Glover v. Prime Care Medical

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7635

WILLIAM KEVIN GLOVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRIME CARE MEDICAL COMPANY; PENNSYLVANIA INSTITUTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; JOHN DOE MEDICAL COMPANY; NCCHC INCORPORATED; CARL HOFFMAN, Dr. D.O. President - Prime Care Medi- cal Company; WILLIAM ANDERSON, Administration/ Marketing Prime Care Medical; PAM FULTON, Medical Administrator - Prime Care Medical; JOHN T. MADDEN, Judge, Marshall County Circuit Court; WILLIAM DAVIS, Commissioner, Department of Corrections; GREGORY, X-Commissioner; NICHOLAS HUN, X-Commissioner; PAUL KIRBY, Warden, N.R.J.C.F; GEORGE E. TRENT, X-Warden; NORMAN WOOD, Dr.; RICHARD GLASS, Dr.; CARL LEGURSKY, X-Warden; TERESA WAID, Acting War- den; TIM WHITTINGTON, Acting Warden; ALL LIABLE INSURANCE COMPANIES, PER PERSON/PER COMPANY; MOUNT OLIVE CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-98-1139-5)

Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Kevin Glover, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Glover appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on Glover’s

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Glover v. Prime Care Medical, No. CA-98-1139-5

(S.D.W.Va. Nov. 18, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished