Dunn v. Westinghouse Savan
Dunn v. Westinghouse Savan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1471
DAN K. DUNN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-2213-1-6BC)
Submitted: December 30, 1999 Decided: February 25, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard E. Miley, North Augusta, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Jonathan P. Pearson, James H. Fowles, III, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Dan K. Dunn appeals the district court's order granting sum- mary judgment in his former employer's favor in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, the joint appendices, and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dunn v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., No. CA-97- 2213-1-6BC (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.