Page v. Apfel, Commissioner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Page v. Apfel, Commissioner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2154

JEFFERY E. PAGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-98-182-2)

Submitted: February 8, 2000 Decided: February 24, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Wolfe, Erick A. Bowman, WOLFE & FARMER, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. James A. Winn, Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief Counsel, David F. Chermol, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jeffery E. Page appeals the district court’s order granting

the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in his action for

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income and

affirming the Commissioner’s determination that Page is not dis-

abled. See Page v. Apfel, No. CA-98-182-2 (W.D. Va. June 23,

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. We conclude the Commissioner’s

decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Richardson v.

Perales,

402 U.S. 389, 401

(1971). Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished