Page v. Apfel, Commissioner
Page v. Apfel, Commissioner
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2154
JEFFERY E. PAGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-98-182-2)
Submitted: February 8, 2000 Decided: February 24, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph E. Wolfe, Erick A. Bowman, WOLFE & FARMER, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. James A. Winn, Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief Counsel, David F. Chermol, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Jeffery E. Page appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment in his action for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income and affirming the Commissioner’s determination that Page is not dis- abled. See Page v. Apfel, No. CA-98-182-2 (W.D. Va. June 23, 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. We conclude the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.