Vest v. McDade
Vest v. McDade
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000
KEITH BRENT VEST,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
MARTIN MCDADE; MICHAEL F. EASLEY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-273-BO-5-2)
Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: February 22, 2000
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Brent Vest, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Fitzgerald Wyatt, WYATT, EARLY, HARRIS, WHEELER & HAUSER, High Point, North Carolina; George Bullock Currin, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CARO- LINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Keith Brent Vest seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West
1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See Vest v. McDade, No. CA-97-273-BO-5-2 (E.D.N.C.
June 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished