United States v. Williams
United States v. Williams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7375
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RODERICK WILLIAMS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-97-41-3, CA-99-3-4)
Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, As- sistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Roderick Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West
Supp. 1999) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-97-41-3; CA-99-3-4 (E.D. Va.
Sept. 22 & Oct. 25, 1999). We deny leave to appeal in forma pau-
peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished