UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7364

DAVID BRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

C. MOORE, Sgt, CO III, 7 am to 3 pm shift; D. BAKER, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; E. ITNYER, Officer, CO II 7 am to 3 pm shift; OFFICER POWELL, Co I, 7 am to 3 pm shift; J. ROSEBERRY, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; E. CLARK, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; J. B. AMBROSE, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; SERGEANT MARTIN, CO III 7 am to 3 pm shift; AL DAVIS, Hearing Officer's Disciplin- ary Hearing; JOSEPH P. SACHETT, Warden; T. MUNSON, CO S,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 98-3814-CCB)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, As- sistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

David Bright appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Bright v. Moore, No. CA-98-3814-CCB (D. Md.

Nov. 25, 1998 & Sept. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2