Acevedo v. Garraghty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Acevedo v. Garraghty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7523

JAIME ACEVEDO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. A. GARRAGHTY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-99-288-7)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jaime Acevedo, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant At- torney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jaime Acevedo seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See Acevedo v. Garraghty, No. CA-99-

288-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished