Parraga v. Henderson
Parraga v. Henderson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1129
SUSAN M. PARRAGA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, U. S. Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 98-2051-CCB)
Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: March 2, 2000
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and Samuel G. WILSON, Chief United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James J. Nolan, Jr., John B. Bratt, PIERSON, PIERSON & NOLAN, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Perry F. Sekus, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Susan M. Parraga appeals the district court’s order granting
Appellee summary judgment in her employment discrimination action.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on
the reasoning of the district court. See Parraga v. Henderson, No.
CA-98-2051-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished