Wilhelmj v. First Bank
Wilhelmj v. First Bank
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2470
MARY JO WILHELMJ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FIRST BANK,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
NORWEST BANK NEBRASKA, N.A.,
Defendant.
No. 99-2639
MARY JO WILHELMJ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FIRST BANK,
Defendant - Appellee,
and NORWEST BANK NEBRASKA, N.A.,
Defendant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-195)
Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Jo Wilhelmj, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Bledsoe, Alexandria, Virginia for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
In No. 99-2740, Mary Jo Wilhelmj appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her civil diversity action in which she alleged
that First Bank fraudulently mismanaged the trust established by
her late husband. In No. 99-2639, Wilhelmj appeals the district
court’s order denying her motion to reconsider and furnish new
arguments. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court, and deny Wilhelmj’s motion for
discovery. See Wilhelmj v. First Bank, Nos. CA-99-195-A; CA-99-195
(E.D. Va. Oct. 22 & Dec. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished