Ingram v. Danzig
Ingram v. Danzig
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2419
GREGORY W. INGRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD L. DANZIG, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOHN H. DALTON, Secretary, Department of the Navy,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-23-A)
Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory W. Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gregory W. Ingram appeals from the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Ingram v. Danzig, No. CA-99-23-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 10,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished