U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Brown v. Kentec, Incorporated

Brown v. Kentec, Incorporated
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2000

Brown v. Kentec, Incorporated

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2499

JAMES F. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

KENTEC, INCORPORATED (CCW); LES PETERS, indi- vidually; PAM DAUGHERTY, individually, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-166-4-H)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James F. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Herbert Seesholtz Falk, Jr., William Francis Patterson, Jr., TURNER, ENOCHS & LLOYD, P.A., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James F. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Kentec, Incor- porated, No. CA-98-166-4-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.