Norman v. Prince George's Cnty
Norman v. Prince George's Cnty
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1135
BRENDA MATTINGLY NORMAN, formerly known as Brenda C. Mattingly, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge; Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-97-3040-JFM)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: February 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mindy Gae Farber, David K. Heasley, JACOBS, JACOBS & FARBER, Rock- ville, Maryland, for Appellant. Sean D. Wallace, County Attorney, Rhonda L. Weaver, Associate County Attorney, Upper Marlboro, Mary- land, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant on the plaintiff’s action under the Amer- icans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Norman v. Prince George’s County, No. JFM-97-3040 (D. Md. Jan. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.