Hunnell v. Lee

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hunnell v. Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7393

HARRY DEAN HUNNELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JACK LEE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-464-7)

Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: March 7, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Dean Hunnell, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Harry Dean Hunnell appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Hunnell v. Lee, No. CA-99-

464-7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 21, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished