United States v. Blackwell
United States v. Blackwell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7343
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RODNEY LEE BLACKWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-94-115, CA-98-978-1)
Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 17, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Lee Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Rodney Lee Blackwell seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West
Supp. 1999)* and reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed
the record, the district court’s opinion accepting the recommen-
dation of the magistrate judge, and the district court’s orders and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See United States v. Blackwell, Nos. CR-94-115; CA-
98-978-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 23 & Sept. 17, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Although Blackwell styled his motion as one seeking relief pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2241(1994), the magistrate judge and the district court properly construed it as arising under § 2255.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished