United States v. Roberts

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Roberts

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL DELANEY ROBERTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-96-291-WMN, CA-99-511-WMN)

Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 16, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifi-

cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Roberts, Nos. CR-96-291-

WMN, CA-99-511-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished