United States v. Whitted

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Whitted

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7480

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TRACEY SYLVESTER WHITTED,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-96-91, CA-99-128-1)

Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracey Sylvester Whitted, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tracey Sylvester Whitted seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Whitted, Nos. CR-96-91; CA-99-128-1

(M.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished