U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Whitted

United States v. Whitted
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 15, 2000

United States v. Whitted

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7480

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

TRACEY SYLVESTER WHITTED, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-96-91, CA-99-128-1)

Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracey Sylvester Whitted, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Tracey Sylvester Whitted seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Whitted, Nos. CR-96-91; CA-99-128-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.