Ward v. Men's Warehouse Inc
Ward v. Men's Warehouse Inc
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2397
WILLIAM P. WARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE MEN’S WAREHOUSE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1291-H)
Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William P. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Sidney Gordon Leech, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & GRAY, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William P. Ward appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to The Men’s Warehouse, Inc., in his employment
discrimination action and denying Ward’s motions to suppress his
deposition and to order responses to his interrogatories. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Ward v. Men’s Warehouse, Inc., No. CA-98-1291-
H (D. Md. Sept. 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished