Falls v. Cummings
Falls v. Cummings
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7145
HORACE L. FALLS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. D. CUMMINGS, individually, and in his of- ficial capacity as an officer of the Blacks- burg Police Department; TOWN OF BLACKSBURG, VIRGINIA; MONTGOMERY REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RANDY ACRES, individually, and as an agent of Montgomery Regional Hospital, Incorporated,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-97-490-7-R)
Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000
Before MOTZ and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis Dene, Joseph F. Dene, DENE & DENE, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. David B. Hart, Peter D. Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia; Kathleen A. Dooley, Blacksburg Town Attorney, Blacksburg, Virginia; Mary M. H. Priddy, GOODMAN, WEST & FILETTI, P.L.L.C., Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Horace L. Falls, Jr., appeals the district court's order deny-
ing relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Falls v. Cummings, No. CA-97-490-7-R
(W.D. Va. Aug. 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished