United States v. Baucom
United States v. Baucom
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7446
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES MCINTYRE BAUCOM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-98-49, CA-99-397-2)
Submitted: February 8, 2000 Decided: March 22, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles McIntyre Baucom, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Mark Salsbury, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles McIntyre Baucom seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifi-
cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Baucom, Nos. CR-98-49;
CA-99-397-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 1999). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished