Goodman v. Sal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Goodman v. Sal

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7368

HARRY GOODMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CORPORAL SAL; CORPORAL MILES; LOWRY, in his official and individual capacity; GRAHAM SMITH, Officer; JOHN DOE, Shift Supervisor; CORPORAL DAVIS; JOHN LAMBERT, Administrator; NURSE MCDOUGALL; FLORENCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-1761-4-13BF)

Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 20, 2000

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Harry Goodman appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Goodman v. Sal, No. CA-98-1761-4-13BF (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for

appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished