U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Cashwell v. Stubbs

Cashwell v. Stubbs
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2000

Cashwell v. Stubbs

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6201

WALTER LEE CASHWELL, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MEDIC STUBBS; SERGEANT DILLENGER; SERGEANT WOOD; SGT. PARKER; CAPTAIN REID; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NEWMAN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-853-7)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 31, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lee Cashwell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Walter Lee Cashwell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cashwell v. Stubbs, No. CA-99-853-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.