Haley v. State of Virginia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Haley v. State of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1121

WILLIAM P. HALEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF VIRGINIA; GOVERNOR JAMES S. GILMORE, III,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-1204-2)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 30, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William P. Haley, Appellant Pro Se. William Eugene Thro, CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY, Newport News, Virginia; Ronald Curtis Forehand, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ashley Lionel Taylor, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Alton Andrew Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William P. Haley appeals the district court’s orders dis-

missing his civil action and denying his motion for reconsid-

eration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Haley v. Virginia, No.

CA-99-1204-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 1999 & Jan. 10, 2000). We deny as

moot Haley’s motion to expedite and deny his motion for general

relief. We deny Haley’s motion for oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished