Woodrup v. US Postal Service
Woodrup v. US Postal Service
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2667
LOUISE A. WOODRUP, of Cumberland County, NC,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, of Fayetteville, NC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-445-5-F)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louise A. Woodrup, Appellant Pro Se. Jerri Ulrica Dunston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Louise A. Woodrup appeals the district court's order granting
Appellee's motion for summary judgment in this employment discrim-
ination action. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. See Woodrup v. United
States Postal Serv., No. CA-99-445-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1999).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished