U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Wilder v. Baltimore Cnty MD

Wilder v. Baltimore Cnty MD
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2000

Wilder v. Baltimore Cnty MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2674

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BALTIMORE COUNTY MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 99-3587-S)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilder v. Baltimore County Maryland District Court, No. CA-99-3587-S (D. Md. Dec. 6, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.