U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Walker v. Nationsbank, N.A.

Walker v. Nationsbank, N.A.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2000

Walker v. Nationsbank, N.A.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2673

HOMER W. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NATIONSBANK, N.A.; JOE TEMPLE; C. KIM NAZARCHYK; FAYE MCDANIEL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-96-1034-5-BR)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS,* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Franklin Davis, Jr., SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

* Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (1994).

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Homer W. Walker appeals from the district court’s order deny- ing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider a prior order denying his motion to remand the proceedings to state court. Be- cause we find no abuse of discretion, we affirm. See Walker v. Nationsbank, N.A., No. CA-96-1034-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.