U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Devon Clarke

United States v. Devon Clarke
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2000

United States v. Devon Clarke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6967

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DEVON CLARKE, a/k/a Little Wayne, a/k/a John Brown, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-126, CA-96-1020-2)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Devon Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Theodore Ridley Carron, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Devon Clarke appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Clarke, Nos. CR-88-126; CA-96-1020-2 (E.D. Va. May 21 & June 30, 1999). We also deny Clarke’s motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.