Tillman v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Tillman v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7002

ARTHUR LEE TILLMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-81-MU-3-1)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Tillman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Tillman appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Tillman v.

United States, No. CA-99-81-MU-3-1 (W.D.N.C. June 22, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished