Thomas v. Garraghty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Thomas v. Garraghty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7285

CARL A. THOMAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-927-AM)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl A. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Carl A. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Thomas v. Garraghty, No. CA-99-927-AM

(E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished