Smith v. Henry
Smith v. Henry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7350
RONALD SMITH, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
MARK HENRY, Warden; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, Director,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-2269-JFM)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ronald Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241(1994) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Smith v. Henry, No. CA-99-2269-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 10,
1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on August 9, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on August 10, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order is entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished