U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Londeree v. Crutchfield Corp

Londeree v. Crutchfield Corp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 29, 2000

Londeree v. Crutchfield Corp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2405

TAMMY L. LONDEREE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

CRUTCHFIELD CORPORATION, d/b/a Crutchfield Corporation; MARK MAYNARD; JEFF CLATTERBUCK, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-31-3)

Submitted: March 20, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tammy L. Londeree, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce McCoy Steen, Kerri Borchardt Taylor, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Tammy Londeree appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e-2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999) for lack of personal jurisdiction. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Londeree v. Crutchfield Corp., No. CA-99-31-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.