Edmonds v. Clarkson
Edmonds v. Clarkson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2526
LUTHER C. EDMONDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. CLARKSON, individually and in his of- ficial capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Cir- cuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; MARC JACOBSON, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judi- cial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; JEROME JAMES, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; EVERETTE A. MARTIN, JR., individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; JOHN C. MORRISON, JR., individually and in his offi- cial capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Cir- cuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; CHARLES E. POSTON, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; WILLIAM F. RUTHERFORD, individually and in his official capacity as Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; LYDIA C. TAYLOR, Chief Judge, individually and in her official capacity as Chief Judge, Fourth Judi- cial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; ALBERT TEICH, individually and in his official capacity as Clerk, Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA JUDICIAL INQUIRY AND REVIEW COMMIS- SION; PAUL F. SHERIDAN, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman, Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission; RENO S. HARP, III, individually and in his official capacity as Counsel, Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-97-364-2)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luther C. Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory E. Lucyk, Edward Meade Macon, Mary Elizabeth Shea, Claude Alexander Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Abram William VanderMeer, Jr., CLARK & STANT, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
Luther C. Edmonds appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to set aside a prior order imposing sanctions
against him. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Clarkson, No.
CA-97-364-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 1999). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished