U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Knewasser v. Warden

Knewasser v. Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 13, 2000

Knewasser v. Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7048

ELIZABETH KNEWASSER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

WARDEN, Pocahontas Correctional Unit, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-248-7)

Submitted: November 23, 1999 Decided: April 13, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Knewasser, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OF- FICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Knewasser seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See Knewasser v. Warden, No. CA-99- 248-7 (E.D. Va. July 13 and 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.