U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Crowe

United States v. Crowe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2000

United States v. Crowe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6097

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

CLAYTON PERRY CROWE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, Dis- trict Judge. (CR-94-32)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Perry Crowe, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Clayton Perry Crowe appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Crowe, No. CR-94-32 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.