U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Levering v. Phelps-Schupple

Levering v. Phelps-Schupple
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2000

Levering v. Phelps-Schupple

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6010

CYNTHIA LEE LEVERING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

PATRICIA PHELPS-SCHUPPLE; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 99-158-CCB)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 21, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cynthia Lee Levering, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Rachel Marblestone Kamins, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Cynthia Lee Levering appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Levering v. Phelps-Schupple, No. CA-99-158-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.