U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Murray v. State of MD

Murray v. State of MD
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 20, 2000

Murray v. State of MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1232

TYRONE E. MURRAY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND; LYNDA FOX, Maryland Department of Human Resources; GLADYS MITCH- ELL, Baltimore City Office of Child Support Enforcement; YVONNE GILCHIRST, Director, Baltimore City Department of Social Services; KENNETH HENDRICKS, Baltimore City Child Pro- tective Services, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-3474-L)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 20, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone E. Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Elise Hee Sook Song, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Tyrone E. Murray appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 (West Supp. 1999) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Murray v. Maryland, No. CA-99-3474-L (D. Md. Jan. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.