U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Liverman

United States v. Liverman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 19, 2000

United States v. Liverman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ELTRENTROSE F. LIVERMAN, a/k/a Trent, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-95-151)

Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eltrentrose F. Liverman, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Eltrentrose F. Liverman appeals the district court’s order de- nying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea or in the alternative for a reduction in his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Liverman, No. CR-95-151 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1999). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.